As part of the Art & Ethics project, Nils Stear collaborated with producer Jacob Brookman, Signature Pictures, and Battlecat Studios on a short animated explainer video. The video introduces viewers to Kendall Walton’s influential theory of fiction through a dialogue between Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson. It is designed to be accessible, educational, and entertaining. The hope is that it will interest academics and non-academics working around, or interested in, the representational arts, and serve as a nimble pedagogical aid to students and instructors in philosophy.
You can watch the video without subtitles here:
and with subtitles here:
We are extremely keen to hear how the video has been used (e.g. in studying, teaching, otherwise), what people liked or disliked about it, whether it inspired any interest in aesthetics, philosophy, or indeed anything else. To that end, we invite viewers to share their thoughts and experiences, however minor, with us by email: email@example.com
Walton’s theory is fully developed in his book, Mimesis as Make-Believe.
Nils Stear teamed up with Jacob Brookman, Signature Pictures, and Battlecat Studios to produce a video as part of the Art & Ethics project. It is due to be released very soon.
The video features Sherlock Holmes giving Dr. Watson a quick-and-easy introduction to Kendall Walton’s influential theory of fiction. As well as being designed for the art- and philosophy-inclined to learn from and enjoy, the video is intended to aid professional philosophers looking to quickly get a rough sense of the theory, or to use as a pedagogical aid in undergraduate instruction.
Here is a cryptic trailer.
Call for Registration: ‘Beauty and Goodness: Exploring the Intersection’
University of Southampton, 19th and 20th of September, 2019
‘Beauty and Goodness: Exploring the Intersection’ is a collaboration between the European Commission-funded research project Art and Ethics and the Aesthetics and Ethics Research Group. The conference’s motivation is to get ethicists to think about issues in aesthetics and aestheticians to think about those in ethics, or something in between the two sub-disciplines, in the hope of setting a precedent of mutually beneficial exchanges. The conference is funded by generous grants from the Thought Trust and the British Society of Aesthetics.
Our confirmed speakers are:
Dr. Jonathan Gingerich
Dr. Britt Harrison
Dr. Brian McElwee
Dr. Peter Shiu-Hwa Tsu
Prof. Samantha Vice
Dr. Alan Wilson
Registration is now open! This event is free and open to the public. If you are interested in attending, please fill out this form.
We have funds to offer travel bursaries up to £100 for four early career researchers. Please indicate whether you would like to be considered for these bursaries when registering. Funds will be awarded on a first come, first served basis; in the event that there are more applicants than funds, awardees will be chosen by lottery.
If you have any questions, you can contact us at: firstname.lastname@example.org.
- We can provide a hearing loop if it is required.
- We permit service animals to attend.
- The venue is wheelchair accessible.
- The venue has nearby accessible toilets.
- We can provide a quiet room if it is required.
- The venue will have available seating.
- There is nearby parking to all venues.
- There will be at least a 15 minute break between each 90 minute session.
- We will permit written, rather than spoken, questions during discussion.
Nils Stear’s ‘Meriting a Response: the Paradox of Seductive Artworks’ has been published in the Australasian Journal of Philosophy. The paper considers the ‘Merit Principle’, according to which artworks that attempt to elicit an unmerited response (such as attempting to elicit laughter at something unamusing, or fear of something unfrightening) are to that extent aesthetically flawed. It then shows that this principle leads to paradox once combined with ‘seductive’ works—works that elicit an unmerited response in order to make audiences reflect upon and repudiate that unmerited response. On the Merit Principle, seductive works are necessarily aesthetically flawed, which the paper argues is counter-intuitive. The paper considers a number of ways to save the Merit Principle before recommending an alternative principle that preserves the original’s ambitions while avoiding paradox.
In May, the Art & Ethics project secured over £4,200 from the British Society for Aesthetics to help finance the conference, ‘Beauty and Goodness: Exploring the Intersection’, organized by Adriana Clavel-Vázquez, Panos Paris, and Nils-Hennes Stear.
The speaker line-up of eight speakers over two days will be advertised shortly. In addition to covering typical expenses, the funds will support up to four early career researchers to attend, as well as each speaker, and support additional accessibility arrangements where needed. The conference takes place on the 19th and 20th September, 2019.
The conference brings ethicists and aestheticians together to make contributions to each other’s sub-disciplines; to advance ethicists’ understanding of issues in aesthetics, and aestheticians’ understanding of issues in ethics; to foster collaboration between otherwise siloed philosophers; and contribute further to an already thriving research environment in normativity at the University of Southampton.